it is a group project, my group did send me their papers. In each tool they discussed I needed to come with an abstract, intro and conclusion. this is my part
Note : I will send the three tools papers (which are already made ) the writer need to do an abstract, introduction and conclusion .
in the conclusion need to make a compassion between the three tools as its mentioned below.
Access to the internet is just about a basic necessity in our current times. With the ever increasing use of smart devices, wireless connections provide critical access when cellular service is unavailable or a less preferred option. Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) are commonly used by businesses and organizations to supplement their LANs. Individuals also utilize wireless in their home networks to both access the internet and connect all devices. Since wireless connections are in such high use, this makes them ideal hunting grounds for hackers who possess effective attack tools (of which there are many).
WEP and WPA are the two main security protocols used in Wi-Fi LAN. WEP is known as Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP). It is a deprecated security protocol which was introduced back in 1997 as a part of original 802.11 standards. But it was weak, and several serious weakness were found in the protocol. Now, this can be cracked within minutes. So, a new kind of security protocol was introduced in 2003. This new protocol was Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA). It has evolved from WPA to WPA2 and is now the current security protocol used in wireless networks. To gain unauthorized access to a network, one needs to crack these security protocols.
As mentioned, there are many tools which can crack Wi-Fi encryption. The purpose of this group project is to identify and compare three such tools. These are powerful tools that utilize different techniques and approaches and perform varied functions to facilitate compromise of the network. This group project shall compare and contrast three selected wireless attack tools, with a demonstration provided for the one determined to be the most effective. Feel free to establish an operating environment (business, public space, or home) and the scenario most appropriate for conducting an apples-to-apples tool comparison.Identify any assumptions that are relevant for your analysis.
The project will consist of the following components:
(https://templates.office.com/en-US/APA-style-report-6th-edition-TM03982351)
it is a group project, my group did send me their papers. In each tool they discussed I needed to come with an abstract, intro and conclusion. this is my part
on the conclusion page I will need to have a comparison to be made between the three tools that is used Aircrack, Wifite and wifi pineapple. as it is mention in the requirement page
They have a magnificent team. These people are always kind and willing to listen to your concerns or issues. Better yet, your assignment is always ready before the time, they usually send you a draft to double-check before they finalize your paper.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more