They have a magnificent team. These people are always kind and willing to listen to your concerns or issues. Better yet, your assignment is always ready before the time, they usually send you a draft to double-check before they finalize your paper.
Prepare the ″4.1. Conceptual Framework″ and ″4.2. Hypotheses″ (please see the task file) by considering the sections in the research proposal included in the 1st appendix. For references, you should choose from the journals in the 2nd attachment list. A. Please introduce your conceptual model (avoid repetition with the introduction!): briefly discuss (i) the dependent variable, (ii) the independent variable(s), and (iii) the moderators. In doing so, make sure you include a formal definition for each variable (based on a sound reference). (Hint: Do not first offer a long list of all definitions, one after the other. This is boring to read. Rather, integrate the definitions in the text that briefly describes your conceptual framework.) Include a schematic/visual representation that represents all variables that you intend to incorporate in your research. Try to organize the variables in logical overarching groups (if relevant). Underneath this conceptual model, label all variables in terms of dependent variable(s), independent variable(s), mediator(s), moderator(s), and/or control variables(s). Important: make sure the problem statement and conceptual model are consistent! Expacted result: The Conceptual model (CM) is correctly displayed. It is completely consistent with the Problem Statement (PS). The role of variables is accurately specified. and The variable definitions demarcate the variables properly. The definitions are based on high-quality literature. Please you have to select the references from the journals listed in the appendix. B. Please formulate and justify hypotheses, taking into account the Research Proposal content included in the 1 st appendix. 1-First, formulate a hypothesis for each relationship in your conceptual framework. 2-Second, provide a justification for these hypotheses. Your justification should be based on at least two academic references per hypothesis, combined with some logical reasoning from your side, followed by the formal hypothesis itself. Please select the references from the journals listed in the 2nd appendix. 3-Then, do the same for the next hypothesis. We expect you to justify two hypotheses: one main effect hypothesis and one moderator hypothesis. Expacted result: The phrasing of the hypotheses is correct. and The justification for the hypotheses is convincing and clear, through the combination of the extant literature with one’s own argumentation (synthesis takes place).
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more